Home -> Online Articles -> Increased Image Collection Opportunities
Increased Image Collection Opportunities
The successful operation of DigitalGlobe WorldView-1 has created a new milestone for high resolution satellites. The high resolution sensor and the improvement to the onboard equipment have advanced mapping using high resolution images even without the need for ground control points.
![]() Figure 1: QuickBird image. |
![]() Figure 2: WorldView-1 image. |
WorldView-1, built by Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corporation with the imaging sensor provided by ITT Corporation, is a high-capacity, panchromatic imaging system featuring half-meter resolution imagery. With a nominal swath width of
WorldView-1 is part of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s (NGA) NextView program, and was partially financed through an agreement with the NGA. The majority of the imagery captured by WorldView-1 for the NGA will also be available for distribution through DigitalGlobe’s Image Library. Additionally, WorldView-1 immediately frees capacity on DigitalGlobe’s QuickBird satellite to meet the growing commercial demand for multi-spectral geospatial imagery. It is likely that in the future NGA will decide to move some of their orders from QuickBird to WorldView-1, which will allow for more tasking capacity on QuickBird.
WorldView-1 is the first of two new next-generation satellites DigitalGlobe plans to launch in the near future. In late 2008, Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corporation and ITT Corporation will complete WorldView-2, bringing the total number of satellites DigitalGlobe has in orbit to three; thus enabling the company to offer a constellation of spacecraft that will provide the highest collection capacity – more than 1 million square kilometers per day – of high-resolution Earth imagery directly to customers around the world. Additionally, WorldView-2 will provide eight bands of multi-spectral for life-like true color imagery and greater spectral applications in the mapping and monitoring
![]() Figure 3: WorldView-1 image of |
![]() Figure 4: WorldView-1 image of Castle Rock. |
![]() Figure 5: WorldView-1 image of |
WorldView-1 Data
Similar to the QuickBird satellite data, WorldView-1 data is distributed in five different levels, i.e., Basic 1B, Basic Stereo Pairs, Standard 2A, Ortho-Ready Standard OR2A, and Orthorectified. For custom orthorectification the Standard 2A and Orthorectified products are not recommended. Standard 2A product is not recommended because of the coarse DEM correction already applied to the image data. Basic Imagery products are the least processed of the WorldView-1 Imagery Products. Each strip in a Basic Imagery order is processed individually and therefore, multi-strip Basic Imagery products are not mosaicked. Basic Imagery products are radiometrically corrected and sensor corrected, but not projected to a plane using a map projection or datum. The sensor correction blends all pixels from all detectors into the synthetic array to form a single image. The resulting GSD varies over the entire product because the attitude and ephemeris slowly change during the imaging process.
Basic Stereo Pairs are supplied as two full scenes (490 km2 ) with 90% overlap, designed for the creation of digital elevation models (DEMs) and derived GCPs.
Ortho-Ready Standard Imagery has no topographic relief applied, making it suitable for custom orthorectification. Ortho-Ready Standard Imagery is projected to an average elevation, either calculated from a terrain elevation model or supplied by the customer. It can be ordered from a minimum of 25 km2 from the Library, or from 64 km2 for new tasking.

QuickBird image and WorldView-1 Image
Figure 6: Mosaicked WorldView-1 image of
Geometric Correction Method and Software

In order to leverage the WorldView-1 images for applications such as GIS, it is necessary to orthorectify the images. A geometric model, GCPs and DEMs are required. The RPC model has been the most popular method in orthorectifying high resolution images. More details about the RPC model can be found in the paper written by Grodecki and Dial (Block Adjustment of High-Resolution Satellite Images Described by Rational Functions - PE &RS January, 2003).
The latest version of PCI Geomatics’ OrthoEngine software was used for this testing. This software supports reading of the data, manual or automatic GCP/tie point (TP) collection, geometric modeling of different satellites using Toutin’s rigorous model or the RPC model, automatic DEM generation and editing, orthorectification, and either manual or automatic mosaicking. OrthoEngine’s RPC model is based on the block adjustment method developed by Grodecki and Dial and was certified by Space Imaging www.pcigeomatics.com/support_center/tech_papers/rpc_pci_cert.pdf). Since biases or errors still exist in the RPCs, the results can be post-processed with a polynomial adjustment and several accurate GCPs. PCI Geomatics’ OrthoEngine RPC model computes the polynomial adjustment math model for each image.
Where A0, AS, AL, ASL … and B0, BS, BL, BSL … are the image adjustment parameters, Line and Sample are the line and sample coordinates of an image, and ∆P and ∆R are the adjustable functions expressing the differences between the measured and the nominal line and sample coordinates. The OrthoEngine software supports zero, first and second order RPC polynomial adjustments. It is recommended to use zero order for IKONOS satellite data, first order for QUICKBIRD satellite data, and second order for IRS AWiFS satellite data. One of the purposes of this article is to determine which order of RPC polynomial adjustment would be suitable for WorldView-1 satellite RPC data.
Although the RPC model only requires a small number of GCPs and TPs, high accuracy may not be achieved if the GCPs are not well distributed within the block. To improve the relative accuracy, a DEM can be used if it is
available. During each bundle adjustment iteration, the computed elevation of each tie point can be replaced by the elevation at the computed TP X and Y coordinates from the DEM, similar to the results of changing the planimetric TPs into altimetric points. This method helps improve the relative accuracies between the ortho images, which helps to minimize differences during the mosaicking
process. This option is available within the OrthoEngine software.
Spokane Test Results
![]() Table 1: Comparisons of Basic 1B and ORZA RPC results of Spokane Meters |
![]() Table 2: Comparisons of ORZA RPC results of Castle Rock in meters. |
![]() Table 3: Comparisons of ORZA RPC results of Phoenix in meters. |
![]() Table 4: Comparisons of Phoenix ORZA RPC block results in meters. |
Castle Rock Test Results
Phoenix Test Results
Figure 5 shows a WorldView-1 image of Phoenix. A total of 5 ICPs were collected from the OR2A product. The area has an elevation range of 300m to 500m. Similar tests were performed to the data and table 3 shows a summary of the results. The RMS accuracy without using GCPs is within 1.3m and maximum error within 1.6m. The RMS accuracy improved to within 0.6m when using only 1 GCP.
A block of 8 images of
The block covers an area of 50km by 44km. A total of 14 ICPs and 16 tie points were collected from the block. The ICPs could only be collected on the left side of the block due to availability. Tie points were collected for the entire block and USGS 30m DEM was used during the RPC bundle adjustment to improve the accuracy. Table 4 shows a summary of the results.
![]() Figure 7: WorldView-1 panchromatic image together with |
Pan-sharpening
The availability of a 1m panchromatic band, in conjunction with 4m multispectral bands, provides the opportunity to create a 1m multispectral pan-sharpened image by fusing these images. The concept of fusion for multispectral images is not new. Landsat MSS data (bands 4, 6 and 7) have been spatially enhanced (from 240m to 80m resolution) by using weighted high-
frequency information from band 5 at 80m resolution. Previous techniques used different weighting coefficients for the panchromatic band and multispectral bands. The RGB-IHS transformation is another common approach, where the high-resolution panchromatic band replaces the intensity channel derived from the lower resolution multispectral channels. Although these alternate techniques yield enhanced imagery that appear to be sharper, they destroy the spectral characteristics of the data.
Since most earth resource satellites, such as the SPOT, IRS, Landsat 7, IKONOS, and QuickBird, provide both multispectral images at a lower spatial resolution and panchromatic images at a high spatial resolution, it is possible to perform pan-sharpening for both of these images. However, most of the existing techniques which perform suitably well with medium-resolution images, can hardly satisfy the pan-sharpening of multispectral and panchromatic high resolution images.
Based on the thorough study and analysis of existing pan-sharpening algorithms and their fusion effects, a new automatic pan-sharpening algorithm has been developed by Dr. Yun Zhang at the
![]() Figure 8: QuickBird multispectral image |
![]() Figure 9: WorldView-1 panchromatic image. |
![]() Figure 10: Pan-sharpened WorldView-1 using QuickBird multispectral image. |
Automated Batch Processing
![]() Figure 11: USGS color air photo. |
![]() Figure 12: Pan-sharpened WorldView-1 using USGS color air photo image. |
Conclusions
This article examines different aspects of the WorldView-1 data. The WorldView-1 image quality is better than the QuickBird panchromatic data.
The RPC model can be used as the geometric model to orthorectify WorldView-1 data. It is possible to achieve RPC model accuracy within 2m RMS without using GCPs and within 1m RMS with a
minimum of one GCP for WorldView-1 data. To improve the RPC model accuracy, a zero order polynomial RPC adjustment can be used.
Pansharpening of WorldView-1 data can be performed by using USGS color air photo/QuickBird multispectral and WorldView-1 images to
create a pan-sharpened WorldView-1 image.
Dr. Philip Cheng cheng@pcigeomatics.comis a senior scientist at PCI Geomatics.
Mr. Chuck Chaapel cchaapel@digitalglobe.comis a senior geospatial engineer at DigitalGlobe.
Have a look at: www.digitalglobe.com
The authors would like to thank DigitalGlobe for providing the test data.



























